What is wrong with just using Ant directly instead of a platform
shell script? That is what I am doing.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sacha Labourey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:23 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] What happened to build.bat that was in CVS?
> > I now well understand that you love win32 batch scripts. It is quite
clear.
> > I will *try* to take a look at them. But, what if I provide nice wsh
> > (Windows Scripting Host) scripts? they are a lot more powerfull and
thought
> > to replace old dos-style batchs. I would be a lot more motivated in
writting
> > such scripts. If my memory serves well, WSH is installed by default on
any
> > 98/2K/ME/XP box. For 95, I do not remember if you need to install it
> > yourself or if 95b had it installed by default. Anyway, this "OS" is
quited
> > well aged.
>
> wsh... never heard of it. what is the ext of the file? Anyone running
> windows before 98 needs a good talking to, or a copy of '98.
>
> I personally will never use them, but if they make your life easier when
> adding cool stuff to JBoss then go for it!
>
> If you can try and keep script files for win32 with out an execute bit
when
> you add them (unless it is also a unix exectuable... that would be scary).
>
> --jason
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
