That would require setting up your environment to include the apache/ant/bin
in your path. This could cause problems when moving from project to project
(which may require a different version of ant).
--jason
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
> But since its part of the build system everyone does have it. Why not
> use it?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hiram Chirino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 7:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What happened to build.bat that was in CVS?
>
>
> > Not every body takes the time to install ant on thier systems. They like
> > the fact that it is so small it can come down with the build system.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> >
> > >From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What happened to build.bat that was in CVS?
> > >Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 07:09:39 -0700
> > >
> > >What is wrong with just using Ant directly instead of a platform
> > >shell script? That is what I am doing.
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: "Sacha Labourey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:23 AM
> > >Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] What happened to build.bat that was in CVS?
> > >
> > >
> > > > > I now well understand that you love win32 batch scripts. It is quite
> > >clear.
> > > > > I will *try* to take a look at them. But, what if I provide nice wsh
> > > > > (Windows Scripting Host) scripts? they are a lot more powerfull and
> > >thought
> > > > > to replace old dos-style batchs. I would be a lot more motivated in
> > >writting
> > > > > such scripts. If my memory serves well, WSH is installed by default
> on
> > >any
> > > > > 98/2K/ME/XP box. For 95, I do not remember if you need to install it
> > > > > yourself or if 95b had it installed by default. Anyway, this "OS" is
> > >quited
> > > > > well aged.
> > > >
> > > > wsh... never heard of it. what is the ext of the file? Anyone
> running
> > > > windows before 98 needs a good talking to, or a copy of '98.
> > > >
> > > > I personally will never use them, but if they make your life easier
> when
> > > > adding cool stuff to JBoss then go for it!
> > > >
> > > > If you can try and keep script files for win32 with out an execute bit
> > >when
> > > > you add them (unless it is also a unix exectuable... that would be
> > >scary).
> > > >
> > > > --jason
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Jboss-development mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Jboss-development mailing list
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
