marc fleury wrote:
>
> |Does this include what we loosely called .sar deployment (i.e. Jar file
> |with MBeans and jboss.cfml/services.xml in it)? That would be so cool.
> |:-)
>
> yep.
If you do, please look at the "Service provider" API in the JAR
specification:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/guide/jar/jar.html#Service%20Provider
Not quite sure how to use it, but something like calling the file
META-INF/services.xml would probably be a good idea.
> You took the infrastructure so far with the MLet but making the stuff really
> hot deploy is really a pain, the MLets don't work. I now understand why you
> took the december "argument" on our research so personally, you had in fact
> ran into these problems during the JMX design.
>
> You should have corrected me when I said we would not use this EVER in our
> codebase ;-) it's the building block. I should have known, research is
> never "intellectual curiosity" but almost always finds implementations in
> places we expect it least.
Ah well, it's on track now at least :-)
> You will see, I will try to commit very very soon (I know I have been saying
> so for the past 2 weeks) but the MLet stuff is replaced by a
> ServiceClassLoader tightly coupled with the MBean/url approach... I think
> you will like it, if you understood Dr Jung's work (did you?)
Sounds very very nice :-)
> A simple work. I take what you had pionneered to its real final form and
> its logical conclusion. The microkernel stuff is real and solid imho, even
> if it doesn't look like much, it is, I like to believe, ground breaking
> work.
Yes, agree.
Now, couple that with a Jini-based deploy interface and you have
something really interesting.
/Rickard
--
Rickard Öberg
Software Development Specialist
xlurc - Xpedio Linköping Ubiquitous Research Center
Author of "Mastering RMI"
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
