On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, David Jencks wrote: > Out of curiousity, where does connector (jbosscx) fit into your packaging > scheme? For 3.0 you might consider putting the contents of pool and > connector into one package (if they aren't already) as pool is now small > and only used by jbosscx.
The stuff I did for 2.4 was done based on jar names. If it was a separate jar, I split it off. This is obviously not the correct way to do it. It should be split based on the functionality. I'm still learning about all the different functionality parts of jboss, and how they relate. Previously, I had just downloaded jboss-tomcat, and ran it. _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
