> Out of curiousity, where does connector (jbosscx) fit into your packaging > scheme? For 3.0 you might consider putting the contents of pool and > connector into one package (if they aren't already) as pool is now small > and only used by jbosscx.
Why not move the pool stuff into jboss/connector (jbosscx) and drop pool? --jason _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development