> Out of curiousity, where does connector (jbosscx) fit into your packaging
> scheme?  For 3.0 you might consider putting the contents of pool and
> connector into one package (if they aren't already) as pool is now small
> and only used by jbosscx.

Why not move the pool stuff into jboss/connector (jbosscx) and drop pool?

--jason


_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to