On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, marc fleury wrote: > On the point of MBean not being declared, we are moving to the "dynamic > mbean" route, well in fact the ModelMBean and since juha is almost done with
Interesting about the ModelMBean direction. I recently spent some time trying to use RequierdModelMBean and ran into some severe issues (which I haven't had time to revisit). Namely that I couldn't get RMMB to expose attributes without exposing the getter/setter operations for the attributes as well. Apart from it seeming a bit lame (and I think contrary to the spec) it also meant that attribute change notifications weren't getting fired if you did an invoke() on the exposed operation. Just a head's-up I guess, that RMMB may be a bit goofy (or just easy to use incorrectly (!)). Trev _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
