I was wondering about RequiredModelMBean. Why is it called "Required"? Just so the JMX agent creators know it must be implemented? It seems kinda weird that they would force the prefix "Required".
-David On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Trevor Squires wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, marc fleury wrote: > > > On the point of MBean not being declared, we are moving to the "dynamic > > mbean" route, well in fact the ModelMBean and since juha is almost done with > > Interesting about the ModelMBean direction. I recently spent some time > trying to use RequierdModelMBean and ran into some severe issues (which I > haven't had time to revisit). > > Namely that I couldn't get RMMB to expose attributes without exposing the > getter/setter operations for the attributes as well. Apart from it > seeming a bit lame (and I think contrary to the spec) it also meant that > attribute change notifications weren't getting fired if you did an > invoke() on the exposed operation. > > Just a head's-up I guess, that RMMB may be a bit goofy (or just easy to > use incorrectly (!)). > > Trev > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
