Hi Scott; I will be trying out JBoss_2.4.4-Jetty_3.1.3-1_beta tonight.
I must say that you and your [JBoss-dev] team (Especially Sacha Labourey, and Vincent Harcq) are very responsive, and helpful. If anything, I'm more sure today than yesterday that I'm investing my time, as well as our software's platform into the right (BEST) direction. Wishing you all much success, and Happy new year ;) Thanks Jeff. PS: Can't promise that this will be the last you hear from me ;) >From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "jeff andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS EJB Container Bug ?! >Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 12:10:06 -0800 > > > Hi Scott; > > > > Thanks for your assistance. > > > > I'm wondring about two things: > > - When can I expect this feature inhavcement, and which version of JBoss > > should I look for it in? >Now in 2.4.4, see >https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=497673&group_id=22 >866&atid=381174 > > > - Also when testing the performance behaviour of stateful session beans >type > > on JBoss, the performance was always the same with no defference, wither >we > > had a cache <min/max-capacity> of 1, 10, 20, ..etc > > for 5 (for example) concurrent requesting clients. Shoudn't the >performance > > behviuor improve as I increase the initial cache <min/max-capacity> >value >, > > in order to aviode the performance cost of client's request cache >misses. >Or > > is the same kind of behaviour is happenning as what is/was happenning >with > > the bean pooling (above), for the case of concurrent requesting clients >? > > Would the same thing apply to Entity bean types to some degree too? > > >Its probably the same lax implementation of the max bound, but this is a >different pooling layer that I have not looked at for a while. Entity beans >are >not effectively pooled due to changes to generalize the locking policy, and >are still not in 2.4.4. > > > > > PS: For some reason I'm only able to get e-mails from [JBoss-dev] for >those > > ones that explicitly include me in their "To:" address list. General > > [JBoss-dev] communications I'm not able to receive/see!!!!. That's why I > > missed your e-mail earlier. >You don't have this email address subscribed to jboss-dev so there is >no reason you should be getting posts. Check your subscription address >or create one. > > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
