The beta does not have the change. It exists only in the final release of 2.4.4.
----- Original Message ----- From: "jeff andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 6:28 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS EJB Container Bug ?! > Hi Scott; > > I will be trying out JBoss_2.4.4-Jetty_3.1.3-1_beta tonight. > > I must say that you and your [JBoss-dev] team (Especially Sacha Labourey, > and Vincent Harcq) are very responsive, and helpful. If anything, I'm more > sure today than yesterday that I'm investing my time, as well as our > software's platform into the right (BEST) direction. > > Wishing you all much success, and Happy new year ;) > > Thanks > > Jeff. > > PS: Can't promise that this will be the last you hear from me ;) > > > >From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "jeff andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS EJB Container Bug ?! > >Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 12:10:06 -0800 > > > > > Hi Scott; > > > > > > Thanks for your assistance. > > > > > > I'm wondring about two things: > > > - When can I expect this feature inhavcement, and which version of JBoss > > > should I look for it in? > >Now in 2.4.4, see > >https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=497673&group_id=2 2 > >866&atid=381174 > > > > > - Also when testing the performance behaviour of stateful session beans > >type > > > on JBoss, the performance was always the same with no defference, wither > >we > > > had a cache <min/max-capacity> of 1, 10, 20, ..etc > > > for 5 (for example) concurrent requesting clients. Shoudn't the > >performance > > > behviuor improve as I increase the initial cache <min/max-capacity> > >value > >, > > > in order to aviode the performance cost of client's request cache > >misses. > >Or > > > is the same kind of behaviour is happenning as what is/was happenning > >with > > > the bean pooling (above), for the case of concurrent requesting clients > >? > > > Would the same thing apply to Entity bean types to some degree too? > > > > >Its probably the same lax implementation of the max bound, but this is a > >different pooling layer that I have not looked at for a while. Entity beans > >are > >not effectively pooled due to changes to generalize the locking policy, and > >are still not in 2.4.4. > > > > > > > > PS: For some reason I'm only able to get e-mails from [JBoss-dev] for > >those > > > ones that explicitly include me in their "To:" address list. General > > > [JBoss-dev] communications I'm not able to receive/see!!!!. That's why I > > > missed your e-mail earlier. > >You don't have this email address subscribed to jboss-dev so there is > >no reason you should be getting posts. Check your subscription address > >or create one. > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
