On 2002.02.14 23:36:40 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote:
>   User: user57  
>   Date: 02/02/14 20:36:40
> 
>   Added:       src/main/org/jboss/test/jbossmq/test
>                         MessageBodyUnitTestCase.java
>                         SelectorSyntaxUnitTestCase.java
>   Removed:     src/main/org/jboss/test/jbossmq/test
>                         MessageBodyTestCase.java
>                         SelectorSyntaxTestCase.java
>   Log:
>    o Hrm... silly naming convention.  All of our junit tests are unit
> tests,
>      just some of them are performance related.  Seems odd that we choose
> to
>      name the default tests like this... whatever.

I agree.  "Case" is also somewhat redundant.  I should have argued harder
for sense... but I was a new committer and several people asked for the
current convention.

david jencks

_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to