We should eventually fix this.... among other things.  I have been
trying to remove System.out usage in the testsuite and found that is a
nightmare because we don't use common base classes for beans... the
formatting is all messed up to... a nightmare to say the least.

--jason

 
On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 21:24, David Jencks wrote:
> On 2002.02.14 23:36:40 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote:
> >   User: user57  
> >   Date: 02/02/14 20:36:40
> > 
> >   Added:       src/main/org/jboss/test/jbossmq/test
> >                         MessageBodyUnitTestCase.java
> >                         SelectorSyntaxUnitTestCase.java
> >   Removed:     src/main/org/jboss/test/jbossmq/test
> >                         MessageBodyTestCase.java
> >                         SelectorSyntaxTestCase.java
> >   Log:
> >    o Hrm... silly naming convention.  All of our junit tests are unit
> > tests,
> >      just some of them are performance related.  Seems odd that we choose
> > to
> >      name the default tests like this... whatever.
> 
> I agree.  "Case" is also somewhat redundant.  I should have argued harder
> for sense... but I was a new committer and several people asked for the
> current convention.
> 
> david jencks
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to