Why do we need a pet name variable that has nothing to do with obtaining a snapshot of the code? I don't care that 3.0 is also known by rabbithole. It meaningless.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 4:36 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: build/jboss build.xml > version.name was never meant to have anything to do with cvs. It is > there to hold the rather arbitrary name of a release (ie. rabbit-hole or > whistler or merlin). While understand your desire to include cvs tag > information, I do not think that this is the best place for it. > > I suggest we add a version.cvstag for this purpose. > > This is currently onlyt being used to generate the spec and impl bits > for mf files right? > > --jason > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development