Ok, so I am not as crazy as I though I was.  Basically if we were to start
tagging other projects then we could run into namespace problems.  It would
be better to use something more like 'JBoss_Rel_3_0_0_3'.

That is all I was trying to get across.

--jason


 On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Scott M Stark wrote:

> We are still using those tag names, what do you call this?
> <property name="version.name" value="Rel_3_0_0_3"/>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 5:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: build/jboss build.xml
>
>
> > I thought we were still using R_* and Branch_* for tag names.  As for the
> > rest, I was just getting lost in the esthetics.  I agree that we should
> > include cvs tag information.
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>


_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to