Ok, so I am not as crazy as I though I was. Basically if we were to start tagging other projects then we could run into namespace problems. It would be better to use something more like 'JBoss_Rel_3_0_0_3'.
That is all I was trying to get across. --jason On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Scott M Stark wrote: > We are still using those tag names, what do you call this? > <property name="version.name" value="Rel_3_0_0_3"/> > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 5:37 PM > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: build/jboss build.xml > > > > I thought we were still using R_* and Branch_* for tag names. As for the > > rest, I was just getting lost in the esthetics. I agree that we should > > include cvs tag information. > > > > --jason > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development