On 2002.02.25 04:54:04 -0500 Georg Schmid wrote:
>
>
> If you use JBoss (instead of developing it) it looks like that:
>
> I deploy an EJB jar. After the last table has been created, no more info
> appears on the console.
>
> So I never know whether the deployment has completed successfully (or
> even
> hangs).
> I have to look through the list of (> 30) created tables to check whether
> all of them have actually been created and whether everything else is
> there.
I've changed MainDeployer so it "info"s start of deployment (init) and end
of deployment (start) for each package and subpackage. We'll see if it is
too loud.
>
> In general I am very grateful that with Hunter Hillegas somebody well
> known
> to
> the JBoss developer community is looking at the current
> JBoss version from the user perspective.
>
> So I don't feel so lonely any more.
>
> BTW: I am totally desparate on this bug ("Argument type mismatch after
> redeploy")?
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=521058&group_id=228
> 66&atid=376685
>
> Could somebody be so kind and have look at it, please?
I think this is the remote version of bugs 516684 and 519699, so it may be
fixed only when we use jbossmx. I haven't looked very hard at it however.
david jencks
>
> Georg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of danch
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 04:46
> To: Jason Dillon
> Cc: Hunter Hillegas; JBoss Dev
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Deployer Message
>
>
> There's a big difference in granularity between the code in the
> component being deployed and the component itself: do you suggest that I
> have a static initializer in all of my beans that logs 'hey, i've been
> loaded'?. Even picking an arbitrary component (from those that _do_ get
> their class loaded) is an ugly, ugly hack. An 'INFO' message that an
> application has been deployed is far better. Better yet might be a JMX
> notification from the deployer. At any rate, the cost of notifying on
> deployment is so low that there really isn't a reason for it to not be
> INFO (IMNSHO).
>
> danch
>
> Jason Dillon wrote:
>
> > I probably changed it from info to debug, in that this information is
> > only useful when debugging a deployer problem. Other info level
> > messages should be provided by the component that has been deployed.
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
> > Hunter Hillegas wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe this should be marked as INFO, not DEBUG:
> >>
> >> 12:11:58,396 DEBUG [MainDeployer] Done deploying someear.ear
> >>
> >> Seems like useful information that the server is done deploying the
> >> ear...
> >>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
