That is fine with me. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:47 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution
> Agreed. Did we ever decide on how to reorg things? I think that short > term that if we go with Hirams idea of server(s) directory and leave > lib, client and bin out on top then we can implement this soon. > > I like the idea of having a per server config lib dir to keep core libs > seperated from examples/plugins and such, but i think it will take a > little longer to figure out how to best mod the ServiceLibraries to > handle such. > > --jason > > > Scott M Stark wrote: > > >Rather than making less use of the configuration file sets, we need > >to make more. We should be shipping with at least 3 configs: > > > >1. A minimal config that is just the JMX spine, logging, and JNDI. > >No ejbs, JAAS security mgr, servlets, etc. > >2. A basic J2EE config maybe a little leaner than our current default. > >3. A J2EE + web services config. The whole webOS config. > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
