Anyh objection to use 'server' instead of 'servers'. The singular form lines up better with the other directory names.
--jason Scott M Stark wrote: >No, he thought David's idea of moving everything to deploy >was a bad idea. The suggestion from Hiram was: > >jboss/ >jboss/bin/ >jboss/lib/ >jboss/client/ >jboss/servers/default >jboss/servers/default/conf >jboss/servers/default/tmp >jboss/servers/default/db >jboss/servers/default/deploy >jboss/servers/minimal >jboss/servers/minimal/conf >jboss/servers/minimal/tmp >jboss/servers/minimal/db >jboss/servers/minimal/deploy >etc. > >xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Scott Stark >Chief Technology Officer >JBoss Group, LLC >xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:28 PM >Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution > > >>I thought Marc nixed this idea >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott >>>M Stark >>>Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:29 PM >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] We need more configurations in the distribution >>> >>> >>>That is fine with me. >>> > > > >_______________________________________________ >Jboss-development mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
