Umm... HAVA == HAVE... oops =) --jason
Jason Dillon wrote: > Yes. We should add something like to init fluff (probably in side of > common.xml): > > <available class="java.lang.Void" property="HAVA_JDK_1_1"/> > <available class="java.lang.ThreadLocal" property="HAVA_JDK_1_2"/> > <available class="java.lang.StrictMath" property="HAVA_JDK_1_3"/> > <available class="java.lang.StackTraceElement" property="HAVA_JDK_1_4"/> > > Then when defining the filesets to compile, use if or unless on the > element name to include/exclude bits for specific versions. > > There may be some issues where the code will need to conditionally do > this switching to hook up the proper versioned class (like the proxy > stuff used to do), but I have not checked. Switchable skeletons > should proabably use org.jboss.util.platform.Java to do the same as > above. > > Any ways, I have given this only the smallest amount of thought... > there might be a few other gotchas... not sure. > > --jason > > > Bill Burke wrote: > >> Just compiled and ran stuff with JDK 1.4. I had to uncomment out the >> JDBC >> 3.0 stuff in the connector code though. It would be nice if we could >> conditionally compile this stuff in. >> >> Jason, build meisters...In ant, can you determine the version of the >> compiler you're compiling with and do a conditional compilation on >> different >> source trees? >> >> Regards, >> >> Bill >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Jboss-development mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
