David, AFAICT Vesco doesn't know what he is talking about. With the confirmation that this is a stateless bean that we are dealing with, I really don't know what he is talking about in his CMP engine, it's all wrong.
marcf |-----Original Message----- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David |Jencks |Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:26 AM |To: Vesco Claudio |Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy) | | |I think this is inappropriate use of "bean managed transactions". As far as |I know the MEJB is not in fact starting any transactions, and all its |operations are expected to be not in a transaction. This is what |NotSupported is for. Bean managed tx is for when your bean actually needs |to start transactions itself. Here, as far as I can tell, the MEJB needs |there to be NO tx, it does not have any intention of starting one itself. |If it did, it would have failed long ago when it tried to with cmt on. | |david jencks | |On 2002.03.22 12:11:22 -0500 Vesco Claudio wrote: |> Why not set tx attribute to "Bean" managed? No "Container" NotSupported |> |> I think that the inner container operations can do everything and so the |> transactions must be "bean" managed. |> |> I have tested jboss with this transaction demarcation ("Bean") and I |> don't |> have problems. |> |> If there is not problems I'll commit the patch... |> |> Claudio |> |> > -----Original Message----- |> > From: David Jencks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |> > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:55 PM |> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy) |> > |> > I think the tx attributes on MEJB need to be NOT SUPPORTED |> > |> > I think what is happening is that MEJB is creating a tx context which |> is |> > getting propagated through the deployment system (same thread). |> Normally |> > deployment does not include setting a tx context. |> > |> > Either that or we make deployment explicitly a transactional operation |> -- |> > a |> > good idea but not for today perhaps. |> > |> > david jencks |> > |> > On 2002.03.22 10:14:17 -0500 marc fleury wrote: |> > > |> > > |> > > |-----Original Message----- |> > > |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> > > |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |> > Vesco |> > > |Claudio |> > > |Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 6:52 AM |> > > |To: 'marc fleury' |> > > |Cc: Jboss Dev (Posta elettronica) |> > > |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy) |> > > | |> > > | |> > > |Ehm... |> > > | |> > > |when I wrote, I think to the current jboss 3.0 rabbit hole HEAD CVS. |> > > | |> > > |CMP -> new CMP 2.0 |> > > |> > > 77 is just a proxy to the JMX base, THERE SHOULD NOT BE PERSISTENCE. |> > > |> > > Try to fix the configuration to put in a "fake" CMP engine that just |> > does |> > > nothing. |> > > |> > > In fact is it an entity at all? andreas? |> > > |> > > marcf |> > > |> > > |> > > _______________________________________________ |> > > Jboss-development mailing list |> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development |> > > |> > > |> > |> > _______________________________________________ |> > Jboss-development mailing list |> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development |> |> | |_______________________________________________ |Jboss-development mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
