On 2002.04.24 19:57:23 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: > > > > > >It doesn't pretend to do logging, which is what you need for failure > >recovery and reliable 2pc. Do you have any evidence that anything else > is > >ever causing problems in it? Much to my surprise, all the bugs I've > >thought were definitely in the tx manager turned out to be in my code;-) > > >(OK, there were a couple of minor tweaks I made). > > > > Bugs... in my own code? Ha, you are funny. > > =P > > >Tyrex is way way way more than a tx manager-- it includes all sorts of > >things such as connection pooling. I don't think relying on it is a > >terribly good idea for the long term. I would rather see us add logging > to > >our tm. Perhaps we can get Ole to give us a little advice on this one. > If > >we use the jdk 1.4 nio maybe it even won't be ridiculously slow;-) > > > > I was only implying that we don't have to build every component... if > there is something out there which is better... lets use it. I don't > know about the Tyrex case, which is why I asked for opinions. > > Grow by aquisition where possible, it will allow us to get there > faster.... as long as integration and maintence overheads are kept in > check that is.
IMNSHO the tm is so central we should control the code base of our standard tm. david > > --jason > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
