On 2002.06.11 00:31:28 -0400 Hans Gilde wrote: > It seems to me that there's a bug in the Standard MBean system: in a > standard mbean, methods getProperty/setProperty result in a property > named > "Property", not "property". I believe the latter conforms to the > JavaBeans > standard. In other words, an mbean class with those methods would have to > be > declared as follows: > > <mbean code="monitor.JBossMonitor" name="hpg.test:service=monitor"> > <attribute name="Property">abc</attribute> > </mbean> > > rather than: > > <mbean code="monitor.JBossMonitor" name="hpg.test:service=monitor"> > <attribute name="property">abc</attribute> > </mbean> > > because the later will result in a deployment exception. > > This looks like it could be fixed within the org.jboss.mx packages, which > > I'll happily do, but I'm wondering if it's actually a bug.
It's not a bug. jmx specifies get/setProperty correspond to the attribute Property rather than property. david jencks > > Hans Gilde > > _________________________________________________________________ > Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas - >http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
