Looks like we are regressing back to the previous logging chaos… well not completely.

 

Why are we using fictitious logger names instead using the class name where the logger resides?

 

I guess on the side, why have we renamed Jetty to JBossWeb?

 

Let’s not undo all of the hard work we have done to clean up the logging usage inside of JBoss3.

 

--jason

Reply via email to