That might be seen as implying that it IS a classname, when it is not. does anyone else have an opinion on this ?
the real solution would be to integrate even more tightly (i.e. completely replace) with Jetty's logging. I'll think about how this might be achieved. Jules Jason Dillon wrote: > I think we should prefix this with org.jboss.<something> so that > limiting org.jboss will function as expected. > > --jason > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jules Gosnell >>Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 6:44 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with JBossWeb logger category? >> >>Marc wanted Jetty rebranded as JBossWeb. >> >>All I have done is change the word "Jetty" to "JBossWeb" in the Jetty >>logging bridge. Since Jetty does not use log4j internally, no class >>names are available, so everything was being output to the "Jetty" >>category, now it is being output to the "JBossWeb" category. >> >>The word "Jetty" only ever loosely concurred with the name of the > > class > >>giving the output...... >> >> >>You will notice that the jetty-plugin.sar is now the jbossweb.sar and >>that Jetty MBeans now try to advertise themselves as JBossWeb. >> >>If that doesn't confuse all the users - nothing will :-) >> >> >> >>Jules >> >> >>Jason Dillon wrote: >> >>>Looks like we are regressing back to the previous logging chaos? >> > well > >>>not completely. >>> >>> >>> >>>Why are we using fictitious logger names instead using the class >> > name > >>>where the logger resides? >>> >>> >>> >>>I guess on the side, why have we renamed Jetty to JBossWeb? >>> >>> >>> >>>Let?s not undo all of the hard work we have done to clean up the >> > logging > >>>usage inside of JBoss3. >>> >>> >>> >>>--jason >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >>Stuff, things, and much much more. >>http://thinkgeek.com/sf >>_______________________________________________ >>Jboss-development mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Stuff, things, and much much more. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Two, two, TWO treats in one. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
