Dain helps me say it nicely, Marcf
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:29 PM > To: marc fleury > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Implementing a Resource Protection System? > > > Here is a more friendly response: > > This is a bad idea. You are saying that in the hosted > environment, when > one module is a hog, the system asks "politely" for the other well > behaved parts, to "please let go of some memory, cause the hog over > there wants some." More importantly you are talking about a > huge amount > of effort when you can simply run multiple JBoss instances. If you > compare the cost of say an extra 20 megs of memory per JBoss > instance to > the cost of developing and maintaining this code, you will > agree with me > and buy an extra 256 MB chip for $50. > > -dain > > marc fleury wrote: > > Dain, > > > > How can I say this nicely to you? > > > > marcf > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:22 PM > >>To: marc fleury > >>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Implementing a Resource Protection System? > >> > >> > >>I thought we were not going to call people (or their ideas) dumb > >>anymore. I agree that is is a dumb idea, but we should be nicer. > >> > >>-dain > >> > >>marc fleury wrote: > >> > >>>>I've thought about doing this in some of the other architectures > >>>>I've written from time to time. It's possible to keep an eye on > >>>>memory usage and track its stats over time, so you can know when > >>>>memory's becoming scarce and start telling different parts of the > >>>>system "Memory's tight. Can you do what you can do to > lighten the > >>>>load?" That wasn't all that hard to do- every time this > >>>>architecture deployed a "job" to run, it kept a handle to > them and > >>>>would asynchronously call a method on them that contained "best > >>>>effort" code to lighten up the load and call the GC. That > >>>>works fine when you just know that you're using more and more > >>>>memory and just want to politely ask deployed code to attempt > >>>>to help out. > >>> > >>> > >>>Rhet, > >>> > >>>LOL, do you realize how dumb this is??? You are saying that in the > >>>hosted environment, when one module is a hog, the system asks > >>>"politely" for the other well behaved parts, to "please let > >> > >>go of some > >> > >>>memory, cause the hog over there wants some"... Dude, you were > >>>sleeping when you wrote this. I'll sue you if you commit > >> > >>this to our > >> > >>>tree :) > >>> > >>>Marcf > >>> > >>>PS: for your own application it was probably fine > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>------------------------------------------------------- > >>>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >>>PC Mods, Computing goodies, cases & more http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>Jboss-development mailing list > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > >> > > > -- > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Dain Sundstrom > Chief Architect JBossCMP > JBoss Group, LLC > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek PC Mods, Computing goodies, cases & more http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
