The enterprise-beans section should be for deployment bindings from the ejb-jar.xml/enterprise-beans section. The invocation protocol for all stateless session beans should be defined at a container related level, not a particular instance of a session bean. Right now we have functionally related items defined in very different and it makes describing the config logic somewhat confusing. Really there is a fair amount of wacked shit in our dtds that needs to be normalized and cleaned up.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 11:44 AM Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Shouldn't the ejb invoker binding be in the container-configuration section > > In both 3.0 and 3.1 the specification of the invoker to use > > for a bean is being done in the enterprise-beans element > > rather than in a container-configuration element. The > > invoker(s) is really more of a container config element > > associated with the client interceptor stack which is defined > > in the container-configuration. What is the rational for > > Right, the invoker is indeed more of a client thing. However the > "container-configuration" refers to the server assembly of server side > interceptor and plugins. I.e. the invoker configuration doesn't belong > here while you are right about identifying it as a pure client > interceptor + invoker configuration. > > I will let Bill answer but I believe the "enterprise" beans is the EJB > persona of this configuration. In the future this configuration should > be a generic "client interceptor + invoker" configuration snippet. The > predecessor is this ejb one, the future one will be whatever and will > need to be a "client-container-configuration" element. > > Marcf > > > putting the invoker name in the enterprise-beans section of > > the jboss.xml descriptor? > > > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Scott Stark > > Chief Technology Officer > > JBoss Group, LLC > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
