I've been using the explanation of failure style, I hadn't really
considered the other. I would like to switch. I've found writing the
explanation of failure messages exceedingly confusing.
david jencks
On 2002.07.29 12:07:59 -0400 Scott M Stark wrote:
> In the assertTrue(String message, boolean condition) form of the
> junit assertion some people are using a message that reflects the
> expected truth of the condition while others are using a message
> that reflects why the AssertionFailedError is thrown. We need to
> be consistent on this usage. I happen to prefer that when I look at
> the coded statement:
>
> assertTrue("true is true", true);
>
> the message is consistent with the condition. What is the general
> expectation?
>
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Scott Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
> for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
> http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
