Depends on the context.

--jason


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of danch
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 7:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Truth of statements in assertTrue clauses
> 
> Seeing a message like "42 is not equal to 48 (and should have been)"
> would help?
> 
> Jason Dillon wrote:
> > Don't the other Assert.* methods like Assert.assertEquals(a,b)
format
> > the message at all?  I would expect this to show a message like a
was
> > not equal to b (and should have been).
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
> >>Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 3:41 PM
> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Truth of statements in assertTrue clauses
> >>
> >>I've been using the explanation of failure style, I hadn't really
> >>considered the other.  I would like to switch.  I've found writing
the
> >>explanation of failure messages exceedingly confusing.
> >>
> >>david jencks
> >>
> >>On 2002.07.29 12:07:59 -0400 Scott M Stark wrote:
> >>
> >>>In the assertTrue(String message, boolean condition) form of the
> >>>junit assertion some people are using a message that reflects the
> >>>expected truth of the condition while others are using a message
> >>>that reflects why the AssertionFailedError is thrown. We need to
> >>>be consistent on this usage. I happen to prefer that when I look at
> >>>the coded statement:
> >>>
> >>>    assertTrue("true is true", true);
> >>>
> >>>the message is consistent with the condition. What is the general
> >>>expectation?
> >>>
> >>>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>Scott Stark
> >>>Chief Technology Officer
> >>>JBoss Group, LLC
> >>>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>-------------------------------------------------------
> >>>This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job
> >>
> > board
> >
> >>>for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
> >>>http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Jboss-development mailing list
> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>-------------------------------------------------------
> >>This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job
board
> >>for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
> >>http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Jboss-development mailing list
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job
board
> > for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
> > http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
> for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
> http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to