Where is the include task documented... I didn't find it on their website.
--jason > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 5:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Build System... any ideas > > On 2002.09.19 19:32:25 -0400 Scott M Stark wrote: > > I still don't buy it. Many of the existing tests involve several > > functional modules > > so how do I associate the test with its module? > > I see your point, many of the "jmx" tests that test system module > functionality rely on ejbs, etc etc, to provide a sufficient environment. > > > The compilation issue is > > a simple > > by product of having a huge monolithic build file, and further > > complicated by > > xdoclet having to be run as a first pass to generate the code. I better > > not wake > > up one morning and have the testsuite laying in pieces in CVS without a > > clear > > consensus on this approach. > > So are you suggesting that there be, more or less, a build file per > testsuite directory (e.g. org/jboss/test/jmx gets a build.xml)? Then the > testsuite/build.xml calls each of them? > > I think that would accomplish essentially the same thing I was suggesting > with the generic targets for "run xdoclet in one directory" and "build > jars > from one directory" suggestion. Smaller build files might be easier to > understand individually, but might also be significantly slower. > > The ant 1.5.1 include task might help, we could include the specific > xdoclet and jar targets from small build files while keeping a single > global javac task. > > david jencks > > > > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Scott Stark > > Chief Technology Officer > > JBoss Group, LLC > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 4:15 PM > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Build System... any ideas > > > > > > > On 2002.09.19 18:05:46 -0400 Scott M Stark wrote: > > > > Add -Dnojars=true during the run of the single test and zero > > compilation > > > > time is the result. > > > > > > Umm, yes, I know about nojars, I wrote it. > > > > > > It doesn't help much if you changed the test and need to recompile, > the > > > situation I find time consuming. > > > > > > > Add -Djbosstest.nodeploy=true and you can also avoid having to > deploy > > the > > > > tests > > > > into the server. > > > > > > Doesn't this require you to copy the appropriate test jar into the > > deploy > > > directory? Are there any deployments that take a significant amount > of > > > time? > > > > > > I routinely run single tests in 10 seconds with these > > > > options. Refactoring > > > > the entire testsuite for a simple usage problems is silly. > > > > > > Having to spend 7 minutes to try a simple change to a test is a lot > > > sillier. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Breaking up the huge monolithic build file into seperates test files > > > > would be a good thing. > > > > This is what we had in 2.4 and it was nice when we had < 200 tests. > > Now > > > > as we > > > > approach 1000 its time to revisit this as well. > > > > > > Agreed, this is a better solution, but also more work. I think the > > > test/module in the modules is the way to go here. > > > > > > david jencks > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
