Neale Swinnerton wrote: > The problem was (is?) that BCEL uses arrays rather than collections in > it's API to generate the byte code so you end up doing lots of > Collection -> array -> Collection manipulation. > > At the time there was no easy way to map java.lang.ref.Method et al to > the BCEL representations, so there's a bit of crap to get around that > stuff too. > > Also BCELifier (which takes a .class file and produces a BCEL > implementation of a class that produces the same .class) wasn't > available either > > However...BCEL has matured quite a lot since the first port I did back > in Feb. so the code definitely needs a review against improvements in > the BCEL APIs. I'll have a look today (dunno if my R/W is still active > tho')
Cool. BTW, your RW is still good. -dain ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
