|
randahl,
I am
swimming back up this thread as it seems it has kicked up a fuss.
.
dude,
the bottom line is very simple. If you really care, you put your time on
the line, or you pay us to do it (we do a lot of work under contract for
customers on this list). I do believe that the separation is already
there, or almost there, so it wouldn't be too much hassle to really decouple ( i
do believe it is already there again). At most it would be a simpler
configuration file with possibly a SAR, although there is some logging going on
at boot time.
The
separation between "nice to have and must have" is determined by your eagerness
to give us your time or your money, if you are ready to pay in one
form then the feature is real, you really need it.
As you
know Einstein already proved time=money and it helps us keep the codebase real,
with real features, but we let you say how real you want it.
marc
f
|
Title: Message
- [JBoss-dev] Design: Plans to decouple JBoss from log4... Randahl Fink Isaksen
- Re: [JBoss-dev] Design: Plans to decouple JBoss ... Jason Dillon
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Design: Plans to decouple JB... Randahl Fink Isaksen
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Design: Plans to decoupl... Jason Dillon
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Design: Plans to decouple JBoss ... marc fleury
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Design: Plans to decouple JB... Randahl Fink Isaksen
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Design: Plans to decoupl... marc fleury
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Design: Plans to decouple JBoss ... James Higginbotham
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Design: Plans to decouple JB... Jason Dillon
- Re: [JBoss-dev] Design: Plans to decoupl... David Jencks
- Re: [JBoss-dev] Design: Plans to dec... Jason Dillon
- Re: [JBoss-dev] Design: Plans t... Scott M Stark
- Re: [JBoss-dev] Design: Pla... Jason Dillon
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Design: Plans t... Matt Munz
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Design: Plans to decouple JBoss ... James Higginbotham
