It is too bad commons logging does not provide abstractions for a ContextStack or ContextMap similar to Log4j's NDC and MDC. These are valuable constructs.
Do you know anyone on the commons logging team? --jason > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Higginbotham > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 6:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Design: Plans to decouple JBoss from log4j > > > > Do you know how you switch the LogFactory impl? I am > > guessing there is a > > system property, but I did not see anything obvious by looking at the > > javadocs. > > I've been using commons logging for a few months now - not bad at all.. > You drive the impl from a properties file called commons-logging, like > so: > > org.apache.commons.logging.Log=org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SimpleLog > > If you put in log4j, just put the log4j properties or xml file in the > classpath so log4j can initialize when needed. The nice thing about > using this API is that they have done the factory work for you, allowing > jboss clients to use the simplelog they provide, a null log, jdk1.4 > (ugh), or whatever. Sure, you have that abstraction, but do you really > want to do the simple factory work? Probably not, as you guys have more > important things to do ;) > > James > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
