Perhaps I worded this somewhat confusingly - although it seems clear to me (you may want to reread the sentences prior to your comment below). I said that I have not bothered to try building JBoss in an IDE because "it is generally ***harder*** to build ***inside*** an IDE than outside of one."
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 13:16, Matt Munz wrote: > Ben, > > > I'd also like to know whether anyone has succeeded in > > building/debugging with Eclipse. > > http://jboss.org/developers/guides/eclipse-howto/ > > > is generally harder to build inside > > an IDE than outside one - so I haven't even bothered to try it. > > IMO not true in this case. In fact, JBoss cannot be built at all in > Eclipse. Eclipse will generate some class files, sure, but it won't create > the full set of distributables that make up the server. > > - Matt > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:jboss-development-admin@;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Ben > Tompkins > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 1:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] janitorial work > > > Is there some reason why the precise commands required > to checkout a correct build cannot simply be posted > somewhere? > > I am using: > > CVSROOT=pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jboss > > cvs login (if necessary) > cvs co jboss-head > > or > > cvs co -r <release-tag> <release-module> > > I see that some recent commits have specified Branch_3_0. > > So my next attempt will be: > > cvs co -r Branch_3_0 jboss-3.0 > > Someone please correct me if I am wrong. > > > As far as I can make out, the only system dependency is the > Java VM and the PATH. The build scripts unset/ignore ANT_HOME, > because ant, as well as the various XML parsers are included in the build, > right? I'd also like to know whether anyone has succeeded in > building/debugging with Eclipse. There was a mailing regarding this > to the effect that the thirdparty subdirectory needs to be configured > especially for Eclipse and that builds prior to jboss-head are not so > configured- but I haven't even been able to build anything > that recent outside of Eclipse and is generally harder to build inside > an IDE than outside one - so I haven't even bothered to try it. > > > On Thursday 31 October 2002 10:35 am, danch wrote: > > So, Ben...are you hinting that your less than satisfied with the build > > system? That's odd, _nobody_ _ever_ complains about the build system! ;^}) > > > > yours in sympathy, > > danch > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
