Seems like a rather independent feature that can't cause any harm. 3.2 is fine as is 3.0 as long as there truly are no backward compatibility issues with existing services.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sacha Labourey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Adam Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jboss-Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:48 PM Subject: Scott? RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD > Scott, > > Do you accept the beanshell sub-deployer in pre-HEAD branches? 3.2? 3.0? > > Cheers, > > > Sacha ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
