Scott,
Do you accept the beanshell sub-deployer in pre-HEAD branches? 3.2? 3.0?
Cheers,
Sacha
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Adam
> Heath
> Envoye : jeudi, 9 janvier 2003 06:47
> A : Jboss-Dev
> Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE:
> BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD
>
>
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Sacha Labourey wrote:
>
> > OK, I've just tested and the "russian doll" feature wasn't
> working with .bsh
> > files. It is now fixed.
> >
> > Furthermore, I just tested this case: I added a xxx.bsh file inside a
> > ejb.jar file. Result: the deployment process respect the
> > create/start/stop/destroy steps i.e. you have this sequence:
> >
> > - create bsh script
> > - create ejbs
> > - start bsh script
> > - start ejbs
> > - ...
> >
> > and so on. So it works.
>
> Hmm. Most excellent.
>
> I really wish the J2EE spec had features that allowed for some kind of
> user-supplied code to be ran when items were deployed. Having
> this feature in
> JBoss is going to rock.
>
> Is it possible to have this back-ported to 3.0? My gut instinct says this
> wouldn't require modifications to the jboss code itself, but I
> may be wrong.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> Beanshell-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/beanshell-users
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
