On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, at 01:27 AM, marc fleury wrote:
I don't think there is a reason. I've been planning this for a couple months and discussed it at least once on this list.And, finally, why did you tightly couple distributed tx logic with invoker's implementation? Why is not it possible to write an interceptor that does distributed tx stuff that you've described but in invoker independent way?If only ole husgaard was awake :)I have been asking the same question for about a year and a half. I forgot the reason, which probably means it wasn't real, but Ole seemed to have one...
david
marcf-- Igor Fedorenko Think smart. Think automated. Think Dynamics. www.thinkdynamics.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
