dom4j looks much better. > usage of JDOM in the xmbean and several other places using xml4j? Man these names are killing me, dom4j == xml4j?
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 7:11 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-672543 ] depends-list does not work according to documentation > > On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 09:05 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > > > dom4j has a stable 1.3 release. You can see a comparison of a few doms > > here: http://dom4j.org/compare.html > > OK, dom4j looks fine. The xpath support looks very nice. Any > objections if I rewrite both ServiceConfigurator et al and the current > usage of JDOM in the xmbean and several other places using xml4j? > > thanks > david ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
