On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 10:51 PM, Scott M Stark wrote:
me too, obviously. I meant dom4j. xml4j turned into xerces several years ago.dom4j looks much better.usage of JDOM in the xmbean and several other places using xml4j?Man these names are killing me, dom4j == xml4j?
david
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-672543 ] depends-list does not work according to documentation
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 09:05 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:dom4j has a stable 1.3 release. You can see a comparison of a few doms
here: http://dom4j.org/compare.html
OK, dom4j looks fine. The xpath support looks very nice. Any objections if I rewrite both ServiceConfigurator et al and the current usage of JDOM in the xmbean and several other places using xml4j? thanks david------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
