Hi,
I don't know if this is obvious and I am treading old ground or makes
sense or not, but given that JMX remoting already works, if one creates
a Java proxy to an MBean via MBeanProxy and that Proxy instance gets
shipped through the Remoting infrastructure, wouldn't it make sense to
make the JMXInvocationHandler to push invocations on this proxy to the
original MBean through the Remoting pipe that it arrived through? This
would be useful if an invocation on an MBean returns such a proxy object
(say, this MBean is a Factory MBean for other MBeans but clients prefer
typed invocation on the factory) and now you want to invoke this factory
MBean remotely and still get meaningful objects back.
-- Anatoly
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
- Re: [JBoss-dev] MBeanProxy with JBoss Remoting Anatoly Akkerman
- Re: [JBoss-dev] MBeanProxy with JBoss Remoting Juha-P Lindfors
