yes On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Anatoly Akkerman wrote:
> Hi, > > I don't know if this is obvious and I am treading old ground or makes > sense or not, but given that JMX remoting already works, if one creates > a Java proxy to an MBean via MBeanProxy and that Proxy instance gets > shipped through the Remoting infrastructure, wouldn't it make sense to > make the JMXInvocationHandler to push invocations on this proxy to the > original MBean through the Remoting pipe that it arrived through? This > would be useful if an invocation on an MBean returns such a proxy object > (say, this MBean is a Factory MBean for other MBeans but clients prefer > typed invocation on the factory) and now you want to invoke this factory > MBean remotely and still get meaningful objects back. > > -- Anatoly > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
