- Generalization of the proxy factory framework to loose the ejb specific items manifestly showing up in the org.jboss.proxy.GenericProxyFactory which should be a more generic metadata representation. The only difference between the http proxy factory and jrmp proxy factory is a different Invoker type and the lack of a jndi name.

- The whole Invoker layer needs to be migrated to the more general remoting framework. The remoting

- There is an XMBean interceptor which implements the invoke(Invocation) handling in the 3.2.1 admin/devel book which should be rolled into the codebase. The problem here is that is has to deal with 2 types of Invocations and two type of Interceptors. This needs to be unified.

Adrian Brock wrote:
I'm currently working on a HA version,
what changes do you have in mind?

ProxyFactory generates ClientContainer with client interceptors,
invoker, target MBean and exposed interface (need a notion of
client metadata as well).
Invoker dispatches to MBean (ideally we should do method hashing here).

I was thinking about writing an extension to XMBean to receive
invoke(Invocation) as well. This is a stop gap until we can
use AOP in all invocation stacks.
This will provide remote (local optimization) access to the POJO
target with an interceptor stack.
We allow the target to expose a different
remote interface to the management interface (e.g. JNDI has
Context for remote use and the current MBean interface for management).

Regards,
Adrian



------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to