anonymous wrote : Word, Andy. I hate it, too. I intend to only have to learn it once, then make it generic, and then help other people. I can already think of multiple cases where we could have used this at my workplace.
I may be a little out of date with this comment, but isn't this something more suited to a project like XDoclet? That way client code could be kept Application Server independant, and XDoclet could generate the appropriate descriptor for JBoss. It could still provide all the same attributes you described (maybe I don't understand the problem enough to make that statement) and generate the code that will handle the ugliness of the JCA spec. Just a thought, interested in getting feedback on it as this sounds like a good solution. Nathan View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3837477#3837477 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3837477 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
