Javassist is pretty good, problem is that it doesn't have a junit testsuite.
Jason T. Greene wrote:
I should clarify, for WS, we just need plain javabean generation. So I
can add that to our list of things to do. BTW I was too harsh, there are
nice things about cglib. I just ran into a lot of bugs.
-Jason
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
*Jason T. Greene
*Sent:* Friday, February 03, 2006 7:56 PM
*To:* jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* RE: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies
I am all for this, cglib sucks…
-Jason
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
*Scott M Stark
*Sent:* Friday, February 03, 2006 1:47 PM
*To:* jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies
So I have to introduce a proxy for a javax.net.SSLServerSocket which is
an abstract class and so have to use cglib or javassist. I see some
proxy working in the head javassist, but this is not in the 4.0 branch
version. We also don’t bundle javassist with 4.0 currently. I assume we
would rather have javassist be the only bytecode manipulation framework
in jboss. Is there a timeframe for completing the javassist proxy so we
can think about moving hibernate, webservices, cmp2.x, etc over to it?
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Inc.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
_______________________________________________
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
