Rickard �berg wrote:
>
> Hey
>
> marc fleury wrote:
> > Mapping to the global JNDI tree from the java: is on the container.
> >
> > Again look at ContainerMetaData.java in jBoss 1.0
>
> What are you saying? That the container should bind the resource in
> java: by linking it to a name in the global tree?
>
> Yes! But the Deployer still have to *define* this mapping in jboss.xml.
> Otherwise, what should we link to??
It is needed only if you have many datasources... and many pools to
them.
So "Yes!" the deployer must link in case there are many dbs he attacks
from jBoss.
Remember simple is good and 95% are going to go one db, dear.
Are we sure the name needs to appear in the "global" naming at all, as
in visible by clients?
or is it a "system" namespace like in jBoss 1.0.
I know it's a low ball ;-) feel free to loft it
much respect
marc
>
> /Rickard
>
> --
> Rickard �berg
>
> @home: +46 13 177937
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.telkel.com
> http://www.jboss.org
> http://www.dreambean.com
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
