Hey
Dan OConnor wrote:
> If I understand what you are saying, I think Rickard is correct. It is
> the deployer's responsibility, not the container's, to map the
> resource reference to an actual resource in the global namespace.
> See 14.4.2.
Exactly.
> The container provider's responsibility is to provide a tool that will
> allow this mapping to occur. The "tool" could be an XML file that
> they can edit by hand, or something more user friendly to avoid
> "XML madness."
Well, you can enter this into jboss.xml through the EJX GUI.
> You could provide a convenience option to skip this level of
> indirection, and simply assume that the name the bean uses is the
> name in the global namespace. You could even optionally assume
> that, if only one datasource is configured, every name maps to this
> datasource. But these are options. Compliance == indirection.
> Resistance is futile.
I've added the local==global guess to CVS.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
