yes I think the Ozone thingy might make sense after all. Now that we have
got the SQL stuff covered we can experiment with the pure OODB stuff and an
adapter in jBoss2.0 is the way to go
marc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rickard �berg
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 5:30 AM
> To: jBoss
> Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] OODBs, transactions and jBoss
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Rickard �berg wrote:
> > Charles Benett wrote:
> > > This maybe a very daft question, but here goes.
> > >
> > > Background:
> > > I want to build a multi-tier architecture using jBoss as the
> appServer,
> > > with an OODB, probably ozone from ozone-db.org, and
> apache/tomcat as the
> > > webserver.
> > > There would be multiple instances of each layer.
> >
> > Theoretically it should be no problem. However, I looked at Ozone some
> > time ago, and from what I could see it was so "dominant" (i.e. excessive
> > number of "you have to do this" rules) that it couldn't be used in a EJB
> > context.
>
> I might have to take this back. I re-checked the Ozone docs and samples,
> and it just might be possible to do it.
>
> It would require you to generate a Ozone-layer for each deployed bean,
> and create your own caching and persistence-managers, but that should be
> it.
>
> Still non-trivial though :-)
>
> /Rickard
>
>
> --
> Rickard �berg
>
> @home: +46 13 177937
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.telkel.com
> http://www.jboss.org
> http://www.dreambean.com
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
