Hi!
Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
> I think you're missing the point of open source, my friend.
> Though it would certainly be polite and appropriate, there is no
> requirement that organizations wishing to use jBoss must contribute to
> jBoss. Personally, I find the best way to get software to where you want
> it is to work on it not to wait for it, but clearly not everyone agrees.
> I can tell you this for sure: I would not be using Linux, Apache,
> Tomcat, Emacs, or any of the other dozens of open source tools I use on a
> daily basis if I was expected to make a significant contribution to each.
> Frankly, I think you should pop a bottle of champagne every time someone
> (Telkel or otherwise) picks jBoss for a business-critical environment.
> Except then, your code quality would go quickly downhill... :)
I guess my prior email was too harshly worded.
My point was that since they are basing their core service on jBoss and
they are, supposedly, EJB experts, I sure would like to have them
involved in the process. If that is not possible, then at least a notice
saying what they're doing with it would be great. Since jBoss is not
(yet) the de facto J2EE platform any encouragement is welcome.
That's all.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
