> 5) In the next paragraph, the sentence "You get no support, of course" is
> misleading to people who are not familiar with Open Source projects.
> Support is almost always available for Open Source projects, but not
> directly from the vendor (because there are many cooperating "vendors").
> This paragraph actually deals with two completely different topics (hot
> deployment and Open Source/GPL/support). I think it should be broken into
> two paragraphs, and the new paragraph dealing with Open
> Source/GPL/support
> should be: 'jBoss is distributed under the <A
> HREF="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/copyleft.html">GNU public licence</A>,
> which means that it's free, even for commercial work, and is likely to
> remain that way. As with most Open Source projects, support is available
> from third-party vendors and an active <A
> HREF="http://jboss.org/mailing.htm">mailing list</A> of enthusiastic
> volunteers.'
In fact,
we will provide a "certification program" for jboss support very soon.
A very commercial and very needed program from a very open source vendor.
regards
marc
PS: Thanks for all the corrections ken.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
