Yes, and I agree, but in your earlier post you said "java:comp/env/" is
not mandatory which was incorrect. I think you meant to include the /ejb
subcontext there as well.
-- Juha
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Wong Kok Wai wrote:
> Which means the looking up of EJB using "java:com/env/ejb" is not
> mandatory, and to me this means non-portability between containers.
>
> Juha-P Lindfors wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Wong Kok Wai wrote:
> > > See section 14.3.1.1 of EJB 1.1, second bullet point:
> > >
> > > "The EJB specification recommends, but does not require..."
> > >
> > > By that it means not mandatory.
> >
> > I understand this means the /ejb subcontext under java:comp/env/.
> > This is not mandatory. The java:comp/env/ naming however is.
> >
> > -- Juha
> >
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
