I think what we're saying here is that all containers should put
it under java:comp/env/quux if you call it "quux", and under
java:comp/env/ejb/quux if you call it "ejb/quux". Is that not the case?
Aaron
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Dan Christopherson wrote:
> But if your arbitrary name (quux, say) shows up under
> java:comp/env/ejb/quux in one container and under /quux under another,
> isn't that a problem?
>
> Dan Christopherson (danch)
> STR Technical Architect (www.str.com)
>
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Rickard [iso-8859-1] �berg wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Wong Kok Wai wrote:
> > > Which means the looking up of EJB using "java:com/env/ejb" is not
> > > mandatory, and to me this means non-portability between containers.
> >
> > It does not. These names are chosen arbitrarily by the bean developer.
> > The bean developer may choose to use the /ejb prefix convention, but
> > this is not mandatory.
> >
> > Since this is a name that is chosen by the bean developer this has
> > nothing to do with container portability. The bean developer may easily
> > hardcode the string name of the referenced beans in his code, since this
> > is something that will never change.
> >
> > /Rickard
> >
> > --
> > Rickard �berg
> >
> > @home: +46 13 177937
> > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.telkel.com
> > http://www.jboss.org
> > http://www.dreambean.com
> >
> >
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
