Hi,
I just came across a few sketchy comments about the OpenEJB archtecture -
i.e. how both JBoss and OpenEJB both share Rickard's container design. And
in the case of OpenEJB, "the goal of this project is to develop a production
server which people will be able to use for mission critical applications.
Scalability, fault tolerance, and working supports for entity beans and CMP
are top priorities of this effort."
Q1. Does this sort of (even subtly - you know by stating something, you
could negate something else) imply that scalability and fault tolerance are
not up on the JBoss priority list? More interestingly, won't JBoss support
"mission-critical applications?"
Q2: From the architectural standpoint, what the difference between OpenEJB
and JBoss right about NOW?
Q3: BTW, Is there a document that details Rickard's container design? Or is
is another "read the code, its all there" situation?'
Sandeep.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." --
Arthur C. Clarke
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
