words,
jboss will be production ready by september 1st, it's a massive effort and
saying it is just words.
marc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of sandeep
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 4:47 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [jBoss-User] Of container designs and other little queries..
>
>
> Hi,
> I just came across a few sketchy comments about the OpenEJB archtecture -
> i.e. how both JBoss and OpenEJB both share Rickard's container design. And
> in the case of OpenEJB, "the goal of this project is to develop a
> production
> server which people will be able to use for mission critical applications.
> Scalability, fault tolerance, and working supports for entity
> beans and CMP
> are top priorities of this effort."
> Q1. Does this sort of (even subtly - you know by stating something, you
> could negate something else) imply that scalability and fault
> tolerance are
> not up on the JBoss priority list? More interestingly, won't JBoss support
> "mission-critical applications?"
> Q2: From the architectural standpoint, what the difference
> between OpenEJB
> and JBoss right about NOW?
> Q3: BTW, Is there a document that details Rickard's container
> design? Or is
> is another "read the code, its all there" situation?'
> Sandeep.
> "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." --
> Arthur C. Clarke
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
